Deployment case studies · illustrative analyses
Turn network reach into earning capacity.
Two ways to evaluate distributed storage: integrate capacity into a planned modem refresh, or start with a regional deployment. These are planning scenarios—not customer results or deployment commitments.
10,000-node modem refresh · 500-node regional comparison
Case 01 · proposed OEM integration
Make a planned modem refresh earn more.
A cable operator considering a DOCSIS 4.0 refresh could evaluate adding OMT storage to selected customer devices. The commercial opportunity is paid storage near users, with local delivery and reducible network costs as additional potential benefits.
| Planning input | Scenario |
|---|---|
| Deployment | 10,000 nodes over 10 months; 50,000-subscriber footprint |
| Storage | 8 TB raw per node; 5-of-7 coding; approximately 57,143 TB usable |
| Paid demand | 60% of usable capacity at $10/TB/month |
| Incremental rollout investment | $5.12 million |
| Annual net operating benefit at full deployment | $1.936 million |
| Sustained cumulative cash payback | Month 37 |
| Five-year cumulative provider cash after investment | $3.836 million |
Why it could work
The ordinary modem purchase and planned installation already belong to the operator’s refresh budget. The scenario counts additional OMT hardware, licensing and allocated integration costs. Storage creates recurring revenue; the provider retains 95% of storage and delivery revenue before operating costs.
What must be true
The example assumes $450 of additional hardware and $62 of license/integration allowance per node, no incremental truck roll, and paid demand as capacity comes online. OMT support is $12 per node per month. Power, local operations, storage operations and a 5% annual hardware failure provision are included. Ten-year hardware life is a planning assumption. Thermal design, disk integration, firmware isolation, OEM certification and actual quotes still need validation.
Delivery revenue starts at zero. Estimated avoidable transit contributes only $25,714 annually; separate backhaul savings and upgrade deferral are zero. At 30% paid occupancy, the model does not recover investment within five years. Initial cash flow is negative: approximately $496,000 in month one.
Explore and stress-test the cable exampleSource: September 10, 2026 OMT cable-integration model. Undiscounted provider cash, before taxes and financing; not a quote or guaranteed return.
Case 02 · regional planning comparison
When does more storage justify the added hardware?
For a hypothetical regional operator, a 500-node rollout compares 4 TB and 8 TB devices. Larger devices spread the same per-node support charge over more usable storage, but the gain depends on selling that capacity.
| 500-node deployment | 4 TB/node | 8 TB/node |
|---|---|---|
| Usable capacity, 5-of-7 coding | 1,429 TB | 2,857 TB |
| Assumed paid storage at 60% | 857 TB | 1,714 TB |
| Annual gross storage revenue | $102,857 | $205,714 |
| Initial hardware, installation and licenses | $181,000 | $281,000 |
| Annual provider operating net including assumed transit savings | $23,860 | $111,432 |
| Annual provider operating net without transit savings | $6,717 | $94,289 |
| Five-year provider cash after investment | −$65,675 | $257,587 |
| Cash payback | Not within five years | Month 33 |
The business decision
In this scenario the extra $100,000 of investment buys twice the raw storage while the monthly OMT support charge stays $12 per node. The 8 TB case improves the economics only if the additional usable storage attracts paying demand at the assumed price.
Separate capacity relief from cash savings
The calculation assumes $17,143 of annual avoidable transit charges. If the bill does not decrease, use the results without transit savings. Existing fiber construction cost is not recovered cash. Lower traffic may defer an upgrade, but that is a separate timing benefit and must not duplicate savings for the same capacity purchase. Extra disk space does not automatically increase cache hits.
Source: September 10, 2026 regional commercial model. Assumptions include $10/TB/month paid storage, $12 one-time license, $12 monthly OMT support, 5% revenue participation, a five-month rollout, ten-year hardware life and separate failure reserves. Hardware, electricity, demand and reducible charges are estimates. This anonymized analysis does not disclose audit findings or represent a customer commitment. Five-year figures are undiscounted, before tax and financing.
Build the evidence for a decision.
Start with your footprint, a priced hardware configuration, a credible storage buyer, and actual transport invoices. Then test paid occupancy, node costs and rollout timing. A pilot should verify service quality, local delivery, metering, security and operating effort before scaling.
Model your networkOmniMesh / OMT · Planning analyses, September 2026